<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crowdsourcing Wall Street</title>
	<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/10/23/crowdsourcing-wall-street/</link>
	<description>Confessions of a Social Tools Architect</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sherwood</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/10/23/crowdsourcing-wall-street/#comment-17655</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/10/23/crowdsourcing-wall-street/#comment-17655</guid>
					<description>Oops - here's that New York Times link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/26/us/politics/26googlebomb.html?ei=5090&amp;#38;en=cf9c1ba8c49c62b2&amp;#38;ex=1319515200&amp;#38;partner=rssuserland&amp;#38;emc=rss&amp;#38;pagewanted=print</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops - here&#8217;s that New York Times link:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/26/us/politics/26googlebomb.html?ei=5090&amp;en=cf9c1ba8c49c62b2&amp;ex=1319515200&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=print' rel='nofollow'>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/26/us/politics/26googlebomb.html?ei=5090&amp;en=cf9c1ba8c49c62b2&amp;ex=1319515200&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=print</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sherwood</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/10/23/crowdsourcing-wall-street/#comment-17654</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/10/23/crowdsourcing-wall-street/#comment-17654</guid>
					<description>Interesting trend... but you can see where this will go next. Once enough investors rely on these scanning services, a new set of &quot;planting&quot; services will probably go to work, tilting online sentiment to manipulate the results.

Politicians are already at this point, using Google to influence voters searching for info on a particular candidate:

&lt;a&gt; A New Campaign Tactic: Manipulating Google Data (New York Times)&lt;/a&gt;

The tools to organize efforts like this already exist:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://paylancers.blogspot.com/2006/10/influencing-election-with.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Influencing an Election with Crowdsourcing (Paylancers)&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting trend&#8230; but you can see where this will go next. Once enough investors rely on these scanning services, a new set of &#8220;planting&#8221; services will probably go to work, tilting online sentiment to manipulate the results.</p>
<p>Politicians are already at this point, using Google to influence voters searching for info on a particular candidate:</p>
<p><a> A New Campaign Tactic: Manipulating Google Data (New York Times)</a></p>
<p>The tools to organize efforts like this already exist:</p>
<p><a href="http://paylancers.blogspot.com/2006/10/influencing-election-with.html" rel="nofollow"> Influencing an Election with Crowdsourcing (Paylancers)</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
