<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Influence is a Byproduct of Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/10/11/influence-is-a-byproduct-of-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/10/11/influence-is-a-byproduct-of-social-media/</link>
	<description>Confessions of a Social Tools Architect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:29:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Test</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/10/11/influence-is-a-byproduct-of-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-65041</link>
		<dc:creator>Test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/10/11/influence-is-a-byproduct-of-social-media/#comment-65041</guid>
		<description>Hi all! 
 
 
G&#039;night</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all! </p>
<p>G&#8217;night</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socialtwister 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Hidden Reputation System of the Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/10/11/influence-is-a-byproduct-of-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-16170</link>
		<dc:creator>Socialtwister 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Hidden Reputation System of the Blogosphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/10/11/influence-is-a-byproduct-of-social-media/#comment-16170</guid>
		<description>[...] This analysis seems incredibly appropriate in light of the discussion we&#8217;re seeing swirl around not only PayPerPost (1,2,3) but also the related sorties surrounding &#8220;blogging vs journalism&#8221; and &#8220;Edelman vs blogging&#8220;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This analysis seems incredibly appropriate in light of the discussion we&#8217;re seeing swirl around not only PayPerPost (1,2,3) but also the related sorties surrounding &#8220;blogging vs journalism&#8221; and &#8220;Edelman vs blogging&#8220;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

