Confessions of a Social Tools Architect
3 Oct
There was a lot of discussion yesterday about PayPerPost’s recent announcement that they had raised 3M. I think it’s been interesting that the tone of most of these messages, while still negative for the most part, are not as vehement in their opposition.
The one comment which I was most surprised to hear was from Dave Winer. He makes a very interesting and valid point:
When I was a contributing editor at Wired, I went to parties where advertisers and writers mingled. The advertisers would tell us how cool their products were. Could you go to the parties if you weren’t an advertiser? I forgot to ask.
In other words, this is hardly a new practice, but at least now it’s out in the open. Readers know to ask the bloggers if they are members of PayPerPost. They also might be aware that there are less visible ways of buying influence.
I’ve always been of the mind that people ultimately have to pay their bills at the end of the month. Most people would be lucky enough to earn their living doing the thing they love the most – it’s just so rare in our lives.
Most of the objections seem to circulate around ethics. I think there’s a built in control system that prevents this from getting out of hand – common sense. If I spend time building an readership and a connection with an audience, I am disincentivied to do anything that will fundamentally piss them off. If I decide that PayPerPost is a viable method for me to make money, then I’ll choose the opportunities that I think would benefit my readers. It’s hard to conceive that I am willing to shill all that much for $5.
The argument that Google will eventually remove the benefit of this model – that I full agree with. On the one hand, the advertisers won’t see the same traction in the organic search side (negated potentially by the fact that there’s live, captive audience members already there). On the other hand, I’m more concerned what it does for the individual blogger (getting reduced pagerank, for example) and for bloggers in general (getting domains blacklisted and margined downwards).
Ultimately, these last factors are the real items worth discussing when it comes down to populating your posts with links to interested parties – isn’t it?
technorati tags:socialroots, payperpost, blogging, monetization, dave+winer
9 Responses for "PayPerPost Raises 3M – Is That So Surprising?"
Greg, true, true. Good thought cloud. I think, though, the problem is that common sense isn’t all that common these days.
well.. this will get interesting. I can see Google reacting to this fairly quickly, and maybe they’ll fix the adwords/adsense programs so that honest bloggers (those who don’t hire ad clickers) can make decent money off of things that they decide to write about.
The Payperpost systems looks like it could be fairly lucrative for a blogger. Write 20 – 25 short posts a day and get ~$100/day. On top of that get paid for the clicks on ads you’d plaster all over it.. it’d be a good deal until Google blacklisted your site.
Brian – I agree, common sense is not so common in this world. That being said, I think it comes down to necessity. The folks who are saying they would never do this (cough, cough Leo) are already in a position where they would never need to do it. It’s the little guys like me who don’t make anything off of the considerable time and energy invested in this site (haha, that almost sounded convincing) that are really looking for some room to expand.
Mike – I think it’s possible for you to do what you’ve outlined but I’d bet there will be controls that will simply make that not all that possible (I know there are controls to block you posting one after the other). Lots of the people I know that are required to post 10 times a day often find themselves pressed. I don’t think I can do 10 posts a day let alone 25 – and for $100 bucks?
oh.. I was just looking on the “opportunities” section on payperpost – quite of few of the opportunities listed are just requesting 10 words and a link. And I’m sure this will be much like the pay-per-click ad services where a blogger might sign up for two or three different services and so have a decent field of opportunities to pick from. I could see posting 25 little entries with links per day. People probably wouldn’t want to read it, but I’d get paid. ;)
Nice post.
PPP has policies in place to encourage quality over quantity, including max 3 posts per blog per day, you must post at least as many organic posts as sponsored posts and a ranking system similar to eBay buyer/seller feedback. They are still young so more will come to reward quality/creativity/entertainment and discourage shills.
As for the backlink benefits, they are a part of what an advertiser gains, but the platform provides ROI across branding and CPC measures — the blended ROI is significant. With incentives in place to encourage quality there shouldn’t be an issue for Google or other search engines. The content will add to the collective diversity/knowledge/entertainment of the net, providing much more than other indexed blog posts that say “I’m going to the movies tonight, I’ll blog tomorrow about whether my car breaks down on the way…LOL”
Keep up the great blogging and let us know your results if you ever test it out…
[...] Last week, I chimed in on the PayPerPost controversy, sitting squarely in the middle since I believe that natural selection will prune the bad seeds from the tree. Jeff Jarvis has a quite nice description of this process in a recent post: Is there danger in this? Of course. One can be corrupted by the siren call of popularity and, worse, money. But if one corrupts one’s product and credibility along the way, then you can bet that the audience will see through the manipulation, become disenchanted, and leave. That is true of newspapers, magazines, TV shows, and blogs. And in the case of the Business 2.0 bloggers, they can also lose their jobs. [...]
[...] This analysis seems incredibly appropriate in light of the discussion we’re seeing swirl around not only PayPerPost (1,2,3) but also the related sorties surrounding “blogging vs journalism” and “Edelman vs blogging“. [...]
Brian – I agree, common sense is not so common in this world.
Brian I think so too, common sense is not so common in our day.
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.