<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Networking Differentiation 2.0</title>
	<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/06/22/social-networking-differentiation-20/</link>
	<description>Confessions of a Social Tools Architect</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: pixelblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social Networking Differentiator</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/06/22/social-networking-differentiation-20/#comment-11010</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/06/22/social-networking-differentiation-20/#comment-11010</guid>
					<description>[...] &amp;#60;a href=&quot;http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/06/22/social-networking-differentiation-20/&quot;&amp;#62;Greg Narain&amp;#60;/a&amp;#62; has an interesting article on his blog concerning Social Networking sites. In it he talks about the crop of current socail networking sites and what will be the difference between the survivors and the vanquished... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/06/22/social-networking-differentiation-20/&#8221;&gt;Greg Narain&lt;/a&gt; has an interesting article on his blog concerning Social Networking sites. In it he talks about the crop of current socail networking sites and what will be the difference between the survivors and the vanquished&#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Vic</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/06/22/social-networking-differentiation-20/#comment-10987</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 12:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.socialtwister.com/2006/06/22/social-networking-differentiation-20/#comment-10987</guid>
					<description>Either these social networking sites will'consolidate&quot; or will be forced out.  As mentioned in CNN's Browser, MySpace shutdown a site called 'Datinganyone.com' because they were using MySpace users.  With this said, the Big Boys are chopping down small start ups in order to protect themselves and rightfully so.  The less competition for MySpace the better in their eyes.  
Check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/blogs/browser/index.html#115107069542561985&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either these social networking sites will&#8217;consolidate&#8221; or will be forced out.  As mentioned in CNN&#8217;s Browser, MySpace shutdown a site called &#8216;Datinganyone.com&#8217; because they were using MySpace users.  With this said, the Big Boys are chopping down small start ups in order to protect themselves and rightfully so.  The less competition for MySpace the better in their eyes.<br />
Check out the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/blogs/browser/index.html#115107069542561985" rel="nofollow">article</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
