<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcasting Via Mobile</title>
	<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2005/08/22/podcasting-via-mobile/</link>
	<description>Confessions of a Social Tools Architect</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Frank Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2005/08/22/podcasting-via-mobile/#comment-10101</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.socialtwister.com/2005/08/22/podcasting-via-mobile/#comment-10101</guid>
					<description>good service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good service
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2005/08/22/podcasting-via-mobile/#comment-10100</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.socialtwister.com/2005/08/22/podcasting-via-mobile/#comment-10100</guid>
					<description>Despite my general apathy towards the *blazing* speeds given by EV-DO, I think the particular example is due to poor distribution mechanisms.  EV-DO is clearly not a symmetric technology with download speeds anywhere between 500kbps to 1.5Mbps with 700k being average.  The problem is upload speeds measuring in at an underwhelming 200-300kbps, at best.

Change the distribution mechanism to one which mitigates the upload bottleneck, such as bittorrent or any other swarm-based tech, and you've reduced one problem area.  

What gets even more interesting is the implications arising in a real-world peer-to-peer system that allows on-demand content sharing.  I believe Wired had an article about something they termed &quot;Roadcasting&quot;, but the idea can be generalized to person-to-person content sharing in urban settings.  With stable multihop adhoc network connectivity anywhere between 14Mbps-7Mbps, this seems a more likely podcast enabler than 3G technologies.

PS: Your automated checks &quot;questionable content&quot; are overly sensitive, causing extreme aggravation...  In the event you actually want comments, I'd suggest changing it.  It doesn't even like my website address.

www
meshify
com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite my general apathy towards the *blazing* speeds given by EV-DO, I think the particular example is due to poor distribution mechanisms.  EV-DO is clearly not a symmetric technology with download speeds anywhere between 500kbps to 1.5Mbps with 700k being average.  The problem is upload speeds measuring in at an underwhelming 200-300kbps, at best.</p>
<p>Change the distribution mechanism to one which mitigates the upload bottleneck, such as bittorrent or any other swarm-based tech, and you&#8217;ve reduced one problem area.  </p>
<p>What gets even more interesting is the implications arising in a real-world peer-to-peer system that allows on-demand content sharing.  I believe Wired had an article about something they termed &#8220;Roadcasting&#8221;, but the idea can be generalized to person-to-person content sharing in urban settings.  With stable multihop adhoc network connectivity anywhere between 14Mbps-7Mbps, this seems a more likely podcast enabler than 3G technologies.</p>
<p>PS: Your automated checks &#8220;questionable content&#8221; are overly sensitive, causing extreme aggravation&#8230;  In the event you actually want comments, I&#8217;d suggest changing it.  It doesn&#8217;t even like my website address.</p>
<p>www<br />
meshify<br />
com
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
