Confessions of a Social Tools Architect
25 Oct
The next president will be elected, or something resembling that, into office in about a week. We’ve seen a tremendous growth in the use of blogging, the “citizens’ media”, by not only those following the news and efforts of the candidates but also from the campaigns themselves.
The Kerry-Edwards team wins hands-down in their use of blogging and technology (at least in my opinion). This could be a simple admittance that their likely voters are usually connected and in touch with their Internet selves. Of course, it could just be plain, old-fashioned common-sense that there’s tons of people that care about things reading blogs and it’s a great medium to take advantage of.
This leads me to ask one thing, “Should we expect a blog.whitehouse.gov?” In many ways, I think of blogging as RSS’s greatest ally. The reality is that, if you wanted to, you could think of blogging as RSS’s preferred presentation format - as opposed to thinking of RSS as an output of the blogging experience.
Now, put that opinion aside. How much more active would you be with your local government if, say, you could get a feed (hopefully distilled by one or more reliable sources, of the daily/weekly/monthly proceedings and open issues relating to certain topics (which you’ve designated). I’ve often felt that civic responsibility is realistically too much responsibility. How a Senator stands to hold an opinion on every subject matter requiring legislation across a state baffles me. I can, however, quite easily see how my role as a parent might influence my interest in child care issues. If more of the people that are changed by legislation take part, we divide the “responsibility” workload and, logically (though that’s not enough of a test) we get better results across the board.
So what’s the solution really? I have no idea. I was thinking that it would be cool to have thousands of streams flowing from the government. These need not be confidential in any manner, but open enough that I can get a grasp on the new information as it is made available. If it’s hard for a Senator that endures it “daily” how much harder is it for us to get it in huge globs?
Food for thought.
5 Responses for "Should the Next President Be A Blogger?"
John,
I definitely hear you on that. I think there’s a couple of things to it though.
I was intentionally NOT thinking about these blogs as personal blogs so I don’t want to hear about some rich Senator’s breakfast either.
The transcripts are indeed nice but that’s not what I was looking for. I’m not so much concerned about the “blog as buzzword” as I am about the granular streams that give me a better opportunity to understand a topic at large.
Right now, the White House feed gives me a nice look at what W said, but nothing that says what it’s about (except for some deli-thin-sliced titles).
Well, I guess the first step would be to find one that actually knows what the “Internets” are.
Buzzwords or not, politics or not, until we have candidates that actually represent us in the IT sphere (or able to even relate), I would guess it would be delegated to some intern and then censored into a tasteless paste…. at best.
Well, my understanding todate is that all presidents have been complete technology mundanes. So, requiring the next president to be a technology leader, is not going to happen. Even Kerry is barely computer literate.
Hi all,
Thanks for the commentary. I actually wanted to clarify that I don’t necessarily thing the president should be a blogger.
I reckon that, as Jason pointed out, someone else would do it. Sure it might be an intern, but is something better than nothing?
Right now, both campaigns are using blogging extensively, but it’s never been assumed the candidate was doing it. On that note, that hasn’t diluted the value of the feeds one bit for me (though I don’t necessarily agree with everything they are saying).
http://www.kaixin163.com
Leave a reply