<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Design Patterns</title>
	<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2004/08/10/social-design-patterns/</link>
	<description>Confessions of a Social Tools Architect</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ash Maurya</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2004/08/10/social-design-patterns/#comment-7008</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.socialtwister.com/2004/08/10/social-design-patterns/#comment-7008</guid>
					<description>Pete, 

Your examples are right on... I would further refine affinity groups to include real-world associations and groups such as the American Heart Association or IEEE that have a much better defined purpose, than say Orkut, and a real-world social network already in place. I would also add Groove Networks as an example of Shared Spaces.

The key, as you describe it, is really being able to segment content into many different &quot;spaces&quot; - designated by the content owner and ranging from the public Internet to varying degrees of privacy/visibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete, </p>
<p>Your examples are right on&#8230; I would further refine affinity groups to include real-world associations and groups such as the American Heart Association or IEEE that have a much better defined purpose, than say Orkut, and a real-world social network already in place. I would also add Groove Networks as an example of Shared Spaces.</p>
<p>The key, as you describe it, is really being able to segment content into many different &#8220;spaces&#8221; - designated by the content owner and ranging from the public Internet to varying degrees of privacy/visibility.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
