Confessions of a Social Tools Architect
23 Jul
I attended the BlogOn Bootcamp yesterday which was intended to be a hands-on workshop on blogging for those attendees that are interested in the blogging phenomena. Unfortunately, that was a mission that was doomed to fail.
The speakers did a good job with the material they were assigned. The issue was really twofold:
Complexity - Blogging is such a complex industry that it’s often hard to remember the number of bean bags being juggled at the same time. As a result, trying to cram the entirety of the blogosphere as well as demonstrating how to use these technologies into a few hours is a near impossible task.
It would have been more beneficial to do a high level and then dig into the few most important topics than to try and broach the entire space.
Presentation - It’s sad to say, but we’re terrible at explaining what we do in this blogging business. To really sell the notion of anything, really, requires a good deal of practice and refactoring. It takes time to learn what works and what doesn’t, what people like and what they don’t.
Most important, it’s about creating a picture, sometimes literally, that leaves people with a mental model that persists once they walk out the door. For the most part, the Bootcamp failed to create that image and it was easy to tell from the audience.
If we want to make this move, we need to sell it.
3 Responses for "BlogOn 2004 BootCamp: Blogging Needs Better Stewards"
Maybe this’ll help next time… take me, take me!
http://www.jessewarden.com/archives/000602.html
I’ve been a professional trainer and it’s almost universally the wrong thing to have subject matter experts do curriculum development and presentation. The skills are orthogonal.
We didn’t get agreement on the audience definition.
We didn’t concur on learning objectives.
Some presenters included material that assumed prior knowledge.
We didn’t work backward from those objectives to the specific activities that would meet them.
We didn’t have a test or other measure of accomplishment.
We didn’t ask for participant feedback.
We took 30 minutes for a break out of a 4-hour workshop (an eighth of the time).
We had instructors and staff take space sold to students.
We didn’t tie the content back to the core behavior.
We didn’t repeat and reinforce key skills.
We didn’t set expectations that fit the learning objectives.
It was just bad, as training goes.
Even the excellent material and entertaining moments were too small a portion of the whole. A bootcamp should be lean and have maybe 10% fat; the rest going to skill building, knowledge transfer, and verifying that students understand. It should be a repeatable activity with predictable results. It wasn’t.
I realise I might be out of topic but please check out this collection of best music lyrics http://www.lyricshosting.com
Leave a reply