<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SNS 2.0: What SNS 1.0 is Thinking</title>
	<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2004/02/12/sns-20-what-sns-10-is-thinking/</link>
	<description>Confessions of a Social Tools Architect</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Gregory Narain</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2004/02/12/sns-20-what-sns-10-is-thinking/#comment-5529</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.socialtwister.com/2004/02/12/sns-20-what-sns-10-is-thinking/#comment-5529</guid>
					<description>Kevin,

I definitely agree that the tactile part of relationships are devoid from the current crop of SNS tools.  As I have tried to stress in several previous posts, binary relationships that lack any form of texture and that fail to incorporate an interactive context are most problematic and strong candidates to fall down under deeper scrutiny.

Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>I definitely agree that the tactile part of relationships are devoid from the current crop of SNS tools.  As I have tried to stress in several previous posts, binary relationships that lack any form of texture and that fail to incorporate an interactive context are most problematic and strong candidates to fall down under deeper scrutiny.</p>
<p>Greg
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kevin jones</title>
		<link>http://www.socialtwister.com/2004/02/12/sns-20-what-sns-10-is-thinking/#comment-5528</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.socialtwister.com/2004/02/12/sns-20-what-sns-10-is-thinking/#comment-5528</guid>
					<description>The problem with social networks is lack of friction; it's like spam in that respect. We've not had to deal with that problem in earlier economic history; it's all been about taking out friction. Greg Steltenpohl's Interra project, to create a credit card where the individual as a coop member owns her data is a step toward that friction. Taxes on spam are another way to inject friction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with social networks is lack of friction; it&#8217;s like spam in that respect. We&#8217;ve not had to deal with that problem in earlier economic history; it&#8217;s all been about taking out friction. Greg Steltenpohl&#8217;s Interra project, to create a credit card where the individual as a coop member owns her data is a step toward that friction. Taxes on spam are another way to inject friction.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
