Confessions of a Social Tools Architect
12 Feb
Stowe Boyd has some coverage from Palo Alto of a recent panel discussion titled “Social Software: What’s Next?”. The panel included a bunch of the top people from Tribe.net, LinkedIn, Ryze and more.
There are several interesting highlights in this conversation, but I will summarize them as such:
One particularly nice quote, which hits close to home was made by Mark Pincus, CEO of Tribe.net when asked about the number of networks anticipated in the future:
No. It depends. We have to see if the interest keeps up, but there is the potential that the value continues. I can see a world where we want to control our identity. We may want to manage what people find out about us. If the want to buy my car, cool. But I may want to only allow certain sorts of people to learn other information about me. Potentially, standards may emerge to allow you to control information in a big way.
All I can say is the future is now.
2 Responses for "SNS 2.0: What SNS 1.0 is Thinking"
The problem with social networks is lack of friction; it’s like spam in that respect. We’ve not had to deal with that problem in earlier economic history; it’s all been about taking out friction. Greg Steltenpohl’s Interra project, to create a credit card where the individual as a coop member owns her data is a step toward that friction. Taxes on spam are another way to inject friction.
Kevin,
I definitely agree that the tactile part of relationships are devoid from the current crop of SNS tools. As I have tried to stress in several previous posts, binary relationships that lack any form of texture and that fail to incorporate an interactive context are most problematic and strong candidates to fall down under deeper scrutiny.
Greg
Leave a reply